W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:46:08 -0400
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <81ABBDCB-B3EB-437C-A3F4-91AF90125052@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:

> ... there seems absolutely no way that 
> 
> GRAPH <http://www.example/another-named-graph> { ... }
> 
> would be treaded synonuymous to 
> 
> GRAPH <http://www.example/named-graph> { ... }
> 
> because the sameAs statement (BTW, in which graph is the sameAs statement contained?) can't affect the GRAPH name...

I think we all agree that the owl:sameAs issue isn't an issue. Damian retracted his original comment about this here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jul/0007.html

.greg
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:46:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:43 GMT