On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: > ... there seems absolutely no way that > > GRAPH <http://www.example/another-named-graph> { ... } > > would be treaded synonuymous to > > GRAPH <http://www.example/named-graph> { ... } > > because the sameAs statement (BTW, in which graph is the sameAs statement contained?) can't affect the GRAPH name... I think we all agree that the owl:sameAs issue isn't an issue. Damian retracted his original comment about this here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jul/0007.html .gregReceived on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 15:46:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:43 GMT