W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Graph naming in Service Descriptions (ACTION-266; discussion of comment DS-1)

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:11:33 -0400
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <997511D2-8508-4212-B748-080C1A8FED5A@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Alexandre Passant wrote:

> Shouldn't sd:name be a DatatypeProperty, and so the name being a literal and not a URI ? (as Sandro said IIRC)
> Or maybe that's simply the use of "name" which confuses me (it makes me think of something different than a URI / Identifier, as the usual foaf:name).

Right, that's exactly the issue we're discussing. We already refer to named graphs in FROM NAMED clauses by IRI, though...

> Note also that the name property is currently not in the SD RDF file [1], but there's a "named" one. Is that a typo ?

The namespace document hasn't been updated to reflect the current state of the editor's draft (where it has been changed to sd:name).

.greg
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 17:12:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:43 GMT