Re: Fwd: Re: possible erratum

Done.

 Andy

On 30/06/2010 3:51 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> I believe the below 3 errata are still open in our current editors'
> draft, though the section numbers have changed a bit.
>
> Lee
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: possible erratum
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:15:14 -0500
> From: Robby Nevels <rjnevels@gmail.com>
> To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
>
> Looking at
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/):
>
> Section 9.1, third example query-- a base IRI is not declared

Needs ":" defining not the base IRI.

> Section 10.2.2, last example query-- the prefix 'xsd' is not declared.
> It is declared in examples in section 9.1 and 11
> Section 11.4.11, last example query-- the filter statement needs another
> closing parenthesis

Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 16:49:37 UTC