W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Action-193: Subquery test case

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:45:11 -0400
Message-ID: <4C321A27.2020404@thefigtrees.net>
To: Olivier Corby <Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I agree with the results of all of these test cases, though the syntax 
needs some tweaking for the data and for some of the queries.

These test and illustrate good interactions, so let's be sure to agree 
when we talk about them on the TC. (In particular, they illustrate that 
the subquery shares the parent query's RDF dataset (which we explicitly 
decided), and also that the active graph (GRAPH <...>) is passed along 
to a subquery from the parent query (which we haven't explicitly decided 
but which personally makes sense to me, and which I think would be my 
interpretation of the current editor's draft.)


On 6/28/2010 11:21 AM, Olivier Corby wrote:
> Here is a first set of sub query test case.
> Best regards
> Olivier
Received on Monday, 5 July 2010 17:45:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:01 UTC