- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:04:26 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, just read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0009.html and added it to the comments... not sure what to think of it. The mail doesn't really indicate any suggestions. I would be inclined to answer something short along the following lines. Agreed? ========================== Dear Ross, Thanks for the input. You can check the current working draft of the SPARQL/Update specification that the group is working on, which is an evolution of the SPARQL/Update proposal you cite in your paper [4], at: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/ Comments on this document are highly welcome! Thanks, Axel, on behalf of the WG ==========================
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 21:05:01 UTC