W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Combined grammar (work in progress)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:46:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4BA89BED.3070205@talis.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 23/03/2010 10:27 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2010, at 10:13, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> I've updated the grammar to cover aggregates. It still needs tidying
>> to make it more regular.
>>
>> 1/ datasets in update
>>
>> Lee - I haven't included anything for datasets in update yet.
>>
>> I don't understand the relationship of WITH and FROM/FROM NAMED
>> (probably not a syntax issue per se but if I'm unclear I'm probably
>> not going to get the syntax style right).
>>
>> "FROM" makes sense as a work for query and DELETE as information or
>> triples is taken from the data but with INSERT, FROM seems odd.
>
> My understanding was that WITH affected the INSERT/DELETE part, and FROM
> the WHERE part. Quite likely that I'm mistaken though!

[[ 4.1.3 INSERT/DELETE
...
The WITH uri defines the graph that will be modified or matched against
for any of the subsequent elements that do not specify a graph 
explicitly. If not provdided, then the unnamed graph will be assumed.
]]

so WHERE as well for WITH.

	Andy

>
> - Steve
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 10:46:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT