W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Combined grammar (work in progress)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:46:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4BA89BED.3070205@talis.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 23/03/2010 10:27 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2010, at 10:13, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> I've updated the grammar to cover aggregates. It still needs tidying
>> to make it more regular.
>> 1/ datasets in update
>> Lee - I haven't included anything for datasets in update yet.
>> I don't understand the relationship of WITH and FROM/FROM NAMED
>> (probably not a syntax issue per se but if I'm unclear I'm probably
>> not going to get the syntax style right).
>> "FROM" makes sense as a work for query and DELETE as information or
>> triples is taken from the data but with INSERT, FROM seems odd.
> My understanding was that WITH affected the INSERT/DELETE part, and FROM
> the WHERE part. Quite likely that I'm mistaken though!

The WITH uri defines the graph that will be modified or matched against
for any of the subsequent elements that do not specify a graph 
explicitly. If not provdided, then the unnamed graph will be assumed.

so WHERE as well for WITH.


> - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 10:46:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC