W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Combined grammar (work in progress)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:21:47 -0400
Message-ID: <4B9F85EB.1070801@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 3/16/2010 8:48 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Observation:
>
> The quad templates in SPARQL 1.1 Update use GRAPH.
>
> SPARQL triple templates and BGP are like Turtle with variables.
>
> Should we allow the style of TriG+variables?
>
> (grammar wise, it's no big deal because of the "no repeating bnode
> labels" rule).
>
> What about N-Quads?
>
> N-Quads is not a subset of TrIG unlike N-triples and Turtle - worse,
> N-Quads puts the graph node at the end (for good reasons) while TriG
> puts the graph name before the triples.

Broadly speaking, I think this is a neat idea, but in practice I think 
it makes sense to adopt the SPARQL 1.0 Query mechanism for talking about 
quads (GRAPH).

Lee

>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:22:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT