W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Separator string in GROUP_CONCAT()

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:07:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4B913A3D.9020804@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
CC: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 3/5/2010 11:52 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 05/03/2010 11:40 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Problem:
>>
>> There's no way to specify a separator string in the draft GROUP_CONCAT
>> aggregate. I have a vague memory that we'd discussed this briefly
>> somewhere, F2F2, or on a call maybe, but it's pretty hazy. This was
>> brought up in Rob Vesse's recent comment.
>
> Steve - thanks for the detailed write up.
>
> As a process point, can we create an issue for this and explain we now
> have an issue that must be addressed before LC in a reply to Rob Vesse.

I think this is reasonable:

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/55

> This is a good test of the aggregate design and I think its worth
> spending some time on it.

I'm happy to discuss, and in particular would like the final decision to 
come with a supporting test case or 3.

Lee

>
> Andy
>
>
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 17:07:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT