W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:45:36 -0000
Message-ID: <316ADBDBFE4F4D4AA4FEEF7496ECAEF9035DF5F6@EVS1.ac.nuigalway.ie>
To: <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In my opinion this is a question concerning all entailments from D-entailment "upwards".

----- Original Message -----
From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
To: Polleres, Axel
Cc: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>; SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sent: Fri Mar 05 08:08:10 2010
Subject: Re: [TF-ENT] Condition C2 modifications



On 2010-3-5 24:36 , Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> No objections, but one additional side question: 
> 
> Do we have an issue with systems that use canonical forms of datatype literals internally?
> 
> Say you have:
> 
>  :s :p "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
> 
> is a Datatype-aware system really supposed to return 
> 
>  "1.000"^^xsd:decimal
> 
> on { :s :p ?O} 
> 
> but not it's internal representation?
> 
> 

This is a good question, I do not know the answer:-(, but is this an
entailment specific question? I would expect that to be a question for
SPARQL as a whole...

Cheers

Ivan


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html

FOAF   : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

vCard  : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf


Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 08:46:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT