W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:10:01 -0500
Message-ID: <4B8BE6D9.8000206@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
See http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-03-02.

     *  Date of Call: Tuesday March 02, 2010
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: sandro (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-03-02

[edit] Agenda

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-23
           o Next meeting: 2010-03-09 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: 
Souri)
     * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
     * Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL WG?
           o RIF WG (Sandro)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
           o eGov (Sandro)
     * Update - open issues
           o Plesae come prepared to offer strong feelings on any of 
these issues. Issues without strong feelings will be left to the wisdom 
of the editor.
           o Do we have a resolution to the question of whether blank 
nodes are permissible in the template for DELETE?
                 + See 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0146.html 
& surrounding thread
           o ISSUE-51 Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/Update?
                 + See Lee's message at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0165.html 
and surrounding thread & links
     * Protocol - open issues
           o Update fault types - what faults should be defined for update?
                 + I don't believe we've had group discussion of this 
yet. Right now, the spec includes:
                       # MalformedUpdate (a la query)
                       # UpdateRequestRefused (a la query)
                       # GraphDoesNotExist
                       # GraphAlreadyExists
           o Dataset for update - currently the spec allows a dataset to 
be defined for an update operation. This needs to be brought in line 
with the Update specification.
                 + This probably follows pretty directly from the 
resolution of the update dataset operation.
     * To Last Call
           o HTTP Update Protocol (next week?)
           o Property Paths (next week?)
           o Query
           o Entailment

[edit] Regrets

     * Axel Polleres
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 16:10:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT