W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:53:53 -0500
Message-ID: <4B823811.5070504@thefigtrees.net>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone,

I've added some more links to relevant email discussions for the update 
issues on the wiki page with the agenda.

Lee

On 2/20/2010 9:23 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23
>
> We're going to focus on update issues. I'll try to beef up the agenda
> with pointers to relevant discussions, but please do look over the
> issues and send comments in advance and/or come prepared to discuss.
>
> Lee
>
> * Date of Call: Tuesday February 23, 2010
> * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
> * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
> * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
> * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
> * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
> * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql
> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
> * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
> * Duration: 60 minutes
> * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
> * Scribe: Sandro Hawke (Scribe List)
> * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23
>
> [edit] Agenda
>
> * Admin
> o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16
> o Next meeting: 2010-03-02 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: Matthew Perry)
> * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
> * Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL WG?
> o RIF WG (Sandro)
> o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
> o eGov (Sandro)
> * Update - open issues
> o Plesae come prepared to offer strong feelings on any of these issues.
> Issues without strong feelings will be left to the wisdom of the editor.
> o DELETE syntax is ambiguous. should statements be separable with
> optional semicolons? Or is another syntax option better?
> o ISSUE-20
> + Paul says: Are there differences between an empty graph and a
> non-existent graph? I like to think so, but didn't see a consensus. This
> issue affects the need for CREATE and DROP graph operations, and
> controls whether or not INSERT/DELETE control graph existence.
> o Do we have a resolution to the question of whether blank nodes are
> permissible in the template for DELETE?
> o ISSUE-51 Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/Update?
> o (Other issues are not demanding of teleconference time at the moment.)
> * To Last Call
> o Protocol (next week?)
> o HTTP Update Protocol
> o Property Paths
> o Query
> o Entailment
Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 07:54:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT