W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:23:05 -0500
Message-ID: <4B809909.3010101@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23

We're going to focus on update issues. I'll try to beef up the agenda 
with pointers to relevant discussions, but please do look over the 
issues and send comments in advance and/or come prepared to discuss.

Lee

     *  Date of Call: Tuesday February 23, 2010
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: Sandro Hawke (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-02-23

[edit] Agenda

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-02-16
           o Next meeting: 2010-03-02 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: 
Matthew Perry)
     * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
     * Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL WG?
           o RIF WG (Sandro)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
           o eGov (Sandro)
     * Update - open issues
           o Plesae come prepared to offer strong feelings on any of 
these issues. Issues without strong feelings will be left to the wisdom 
of the editor.
           o DELETE syntax is ambiguous. should statements be separable 
with optional semicolons? Or is another syntax option better?
           o ISSUE-20
                 + Paul says: Are there differences between an empty 
graph and a non-existent graph? I like to think so, but didn't see a 
consensus. This issue affects the need for CREATE and DROP graph 
operations, and controls whether or not INSERT/DELETE control graph 
existence.
           o Do we have a resolution to the question of whether blank 
nodes are permissible in the template for DELETE?
           o ISSUE-51 Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/Update?
           o (Other issues are not demanding of teleconference time at 
the moment.)
     * To Last Call
           o Protocol (next week?)
           o HTTP Update Protocol
           o Property Paths
           o Query
           o Entailment
Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 02:23:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT