W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?

From: SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:24:35 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20100216152435.7BB417F408@otto.w3.org>


ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us? 

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/54

Raised by: 
On product:

Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 15:24:36 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ivan Herman: "Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues)"
Previous message: Birte Glimm: "Re: RIF+SPARQL (was Re: Entailment regimes open issues)"
Next in thread: Paul Gearon: "Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?"
Reply: Paul Gearon: "Re: ISSUE-54: Do we need (descriptions of) property functions in SD? Is this in scope for us?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT