W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:32:35 +0000
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <38F47686-1E5F-4F11-B57A-AEDFC5EE08BA@deri.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>

On 12 Feb 2010, at 15:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Sec 4.1.4
> "Note:
> The syntax of this operation can be ambiguous when juxtaposed with
> INSERT/DELETE. Alternatives are to include an optional semicolon at the
> end of each operation, and to change this operation to "DELETE WHERE".
> This is under active discussion."

indeed it is noted, I was just referring to the curRent grammar which still has the optional WHERE part.
> Sec 4.1.5 discusses short form INSERT but I believe that is not
> up-to-date with the discussions.
> "If no WHERE clause is present, then the pattern will be matched in the
> same way"

yeah, that's out of sync with the grammar which has the WHERE clause obligatory
...you mean that whole sentence should be removed, yes? fine by me, if so.

> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0163.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0129.html
>         Andy
Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 17:33:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:59 UTC