side remarks on the shortcut discussion for INSERT/DELETE...

... I have some side questions/remarks concerning the shortcut discussion we had for INSERT/DELETE...

1) If we define shortcuts for INSERT/DELETE, I think it would seem awkward not to have a 
similar shortcut also for CONSTRUCT, i.e.  

 CONSTRUCT <Pattern>  = CONSTRUCT <Pattern> WHERE <Pattern>

agreed?

2)  Another thing... as an alternative to definintg the shortcut by the absence of a 
WHERE clause (which, IIRC was critisised for being ambiguous) couldn't we just use 
"*" like in SELECT, i.e. for instance

 INSERT * WHERE <Pattern> = INSERT <Pattern> WHERE <Pattern> 
 ... 
 CONSTRUCT * WHERE <Pattern> = CONSTRUCT <Pattern> WHERE <Pattern>  

the main question arising if we go that direction is how to handle 
complex patterns, but I think we could solve that, depending whether 
in general that sounds like a potential path to go for the rest as well?
 
Axel