- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:05:04 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Just 32 means 34 I think: [ISSUE 34]: How do entailment regimes interaction with aggregates, grouping, and blank nodes? Birte On 11 February 2010 14:16, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > On 2/8/2010 2:02 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >> I certainly agree with closing issues #28, #32, #40, #42. >> >> I would propose to leave #43 for a while to see how the SD work evolves. >> I predict that what you write below is true, but maybe discussions on SD >> will allow for a finer granularity... > > I will close issues 28, 32, 40, and 42 if there is no concerns raised within > the next 7 days. > > Let's include issue 43 in our next TC discussion of service description. > > Lee > > > -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 19:05:39 UTC