W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Entailment regimes open issues

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:05:04 +0000
Message-ID: <492f2b0b1002111105l49ba42dclc69344104b70a36a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Just 32 means 34 I think:
[ISSUE 34]: How do entailment regimes interaction with aggregates,
grouping, and blank nodes?
Birte

On 11 February 2010 14:16, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> On 2/8/2010 2:02 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>
>> I certainly agree with closing issues #28, #32, #40, #42.
>>
>> I would propose to leave #43 for a while to see how the SD work evolves.
>> I predict that what you write below is true, but maybe discussions on SD
>> will allow for a finer granularity...
>
> I will close issues 28, 32, 40, and 42 if there is no concerns raised within
> the next 7 days.
>
> Let's include issue 43 in our next TC discussion of service description.
>
> Lee
>
>
>



-- 
Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3QD
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 19:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT