W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Draft response for comment N3-1

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:43 -0500
Message-ID: <4B741FD3.20005@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
This response seems good to me.

Lee

On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Draft response for comment N3-1
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1
>
> Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths
> already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might
> well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best
> use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax,
> together with design style and parser complexity.
>
> We could add something like:
> """
> In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in
> N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding
> expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring
> syntax to delimit an expression.
> """
>
> Andy
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:19:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT