Re: Draft response for comment N3-1

This response seems good to me.

Lee

On 2/10/2010 10:36 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Draft response for comment N3-1
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:N3-1
>
> Sandro - there is the specific issue of expressions. As property paths
> already use * and + for their natural regex meaning, expressions might
> well need to be delimited anyway. It is a balance of what is the best
> use of the undelimited form and delimited forms in the overall syntax,
> together with design style and parser complexity.
>
> We could add something like:
> """
> In N3Alternatives#Syntax there is discussion of including expressions in
> N3. Property paths already use * and + for their regex meanings. Adding
> expressions as well overloads several characters so possibly requiring
> syntax to delimit an expression.
> """
>
> Andy
>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 15:19:16 UTC