W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Prioritised list of open issues (query, my bits)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:00:55 +0000
Message-ID: <4B712447.60205@talis.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 08/02/2010 10:23 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/35
> Can aggregate functions take DISTINCT as an argument a la SELECT
> COUNT(DISTINCT ?X)?
> - Seems consensus on yes.

A URI should name the function, not a collection of related functionality.

Example:

COUNT(DISTINCT ?x) vs COUNT(?x)

How do you name the difference if they are not different URIs?

In custom aggregates, what does my:agg name?

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 09:01:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:41 GMT