W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Question on blank nodes

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:45:04 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTintGzswaukQZcztYaqT38hqjEpjOifZFCgRNNFb@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Cc: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I believe these are the relevant minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-03-02

I haven't read them completely, but they cover bnodes in deletes.
Birte

On 29 June 2010 22:39, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Paul Gearon wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to find the conversation we've had on the scope of
>> blank nodes in a delete, but so far I haven't found it.
>>
>> What happens for the following query:
>>
>>  DELETE { ?s :p _:b } WHERE { ?s :p _:b }
>>
>> Is the _:b treated as the same node in the template as it is in the pattern?
>
> Relatedly, I'd wonder if this is exactly equivalent to:
>
> DELETE WHERE { ?s :p _:b }
>
> or if the semantics are slightly different. I can't figure out based on the text in the latest working draft of Update whether these two should act the same.
>
> .greg
>
>
>



-- 
Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3QD
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 22:45:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT