W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Dedicated TC on Test Cases 2010-06-30

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:48:44 -0400
Message-Id: <EFB3F5EC-AEAA-4B33-A4E7-B4103EDC5231@deri.org>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all,

I have drafted a rough agenda for the Test Cases TC on Wednesday... this can still be adapted, if people have better suggestions!

My take would be:

1) we check once again whether we're all on the same page going forward with the same tet cases structure as we had in DAWG (lacking alternatives having been put on the table, I lean toward this)

2) Discuss the README for the manifest format, and whether there are any adaptions needed?
   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
   Please check the document before the TC!

3) Go through test cases proposals... I contected all owners of respective actions individually, it would be extremly helpful to have some example queries with expected answers per category at the least before the call...

4) Discuss responsibles for the test suite... My proposal would be to have one overall editor who is supported by "category responsibles" at least to start with?

5) How about test cases for non-query/non-update stuff, i.e.  Protocol, http-update-protocol? service description? Do we need test cases for that?

6) Lastly, I suggest to have a regular agendum, to collect/approve/discuss new test cases in the regular TCs

Detailed Agenda below,
as contcrete proposals for Test cases drop in (send them to the mailinglist!), I will link
them to the agenda,

Axel

Call in details


When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC

	• Date of Call: Tuesday June 30, 2010
	• Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
	• Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
	• Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
	• Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
	• Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
	• IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
	• Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
	• Duration: 120 minutes
	• Chair: Axel Polleres
	• Scribe: ??? (Scribe List)
	• Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-30
[edit] Agenda

[edit] Test Cases Teleconf

	• Overall organisation of the test suite
		• Lee, can you recap/report briefly from DAWG experiences (I think we decided to go the same route, in the end)
	• Manifest format
		• Axel's proposal
		• Shall we rather go with TriG for describing datasets?
	• Collected Test Cases so far?
		• Aggregates
			• ACTION-191 Axel's proposed testcases
		• Subqueries
			• ACTION-192
			• ACTION-193
		• Negation
			• ACTION-194
		• Project Expressions
			• ACTION-195
			• ACTION-196
		• Property Paths
			• ACTION-198
		• Entailment
			• ACTION-199
	• What's missing?
		• Update
		• Protocol
		• http-update-protocol
		• service description
	• Is this overall structure ok for creating separate manifests? Shall we have one responsible overall, or several responsibles (one for each manifest/category)?
	• Suggest to bring a standard agenda item to the weekly agenda to approve/discuss new test cases, collect any test cases that appeared in mail conversations
	• Implementation status? How can implementations run the testsuite?
Received on Monday, 28 June 2010 16:49:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT