W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

[TF-PP] Moving forward

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0100
Message-ID: <4C0F858F.1030206@talis.com>
To: sparql Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To summarise where I think we are:

1/ Use the expansions approach that Birte proposed in:

2/ Define operators for zero length paths and for arbitrary length paths 
(i.e. +).

2a/ zero length paths include all subjects/objects/constant terms as 
possible bindings (and check this makes sense).

2b/ arbitrary length paths based on triple marking with 
backtracking/unwinding.  Define the operator by algorithm (of course, 
you can implement anyway you want but this defines the correct answers 
and cardinality).

3/ Need to compare the cardinality for arbitrary length paths and {n,m} 
forms since they should agree, and if not, we need to understand why 
(this is why I think the triple marking with unwinding is the way to go)
It may make sense to define {n,m} in terms of the arbitrary length paths 

4/ Examples, examples, examples.

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 12:14:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC