W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:55:45 -0400
Message-ID: <4C0EA041.10008@thefigtrees.net>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, SPARQL Working Group WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 6/8/2010 3:41 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> An idea: We could define ?x :p{0} ?x as matching subjects+objects, and ?x :p{0} :uri to match URI :uri regardless (and all the subjects+objects but that's not gong to change the matches).  Explicit mention adds to the set of possibilities.
>
> Seems like a reasonable solution (if a bit more cumbersome to describe).

Agreed on both counts.

Lee

>
> .greg
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 20:59:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT