W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Need input before I can address Kjetil's comment - Was: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 17:59:10 -0400
To: "Gregory Williams" <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
cc: "SPARQL Working Group WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C81B28EE.11AFA%ogbujic@ccf.org>
On 5/20/10 2:04 PM, "Gregory Williams" <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote:
> On May 18, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>> FYI, I would feel better about addressing Kjetil's comment [1] on this if I
>> had a sense of where others felt about this issue and gave clarification
>> regarding W3C procedure (discussed below).  I don't feel like my response
>> would represent a consensus otherwise without some feedback regarding the
>> email below.  
>> 
>> 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Apr/0001.htm>>
l
> 
> I think that we should consider http-range-14 as normative, but I think your
> changes to the wording clear the issue up. Basically, that we never talk
> directly about a graph, but only "networked RDF knowledge". I think its still
> a bit confusing that "graph URI" is used as shorthand for the networked RDF
> knowledge, but that's an existing problem in previous specs, so perhaps hard
> to fix at this point.

Thanks.  Then I won't be able to respond directly to Kjetil's concern
appropriately since he is explicitly suggesting that a normative reference
is required and we haven't yet had that conversation.  We probably should at
least raise the issue via our tracking system since it is separate from
ISSUE-49 (at least now the wording has been cleared up).  So, my action to
respond remains open.

-- Chime


===================================

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 21:59:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT