W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 06:24:37 +0200
Cc: "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "W3C SPARQL WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6023C941-954D-4BC9-B312-7DD3BAB9B2C1@w3.org>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>

On May 20, 2010, at 05:24 , Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:

>> "We will only define answers with respect to those RDF graphs that are
>> (simply) satisfiable and RIF-Simple-entailed by the combination formed
>> from the (skolemized) scoping graph and a referenced, ***strongly safe
>> RIF-Core*** [RIF-Core] document. "
>> URI in the 
>> table:http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF-RDF-***Strongly-Safe***-Core
> I will change the entailment URI to remove reference to strongly safe.

Note that even this URI does not exist for the time being, I still need a RIF opinion on what URI-s should be created and where...


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 04:24:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC