W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Base URI in updates?

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:33:35 -0400
To: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
cc: "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com>, "SPARQL Working Group WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C8173C7F.119B3%ogbujic@ccf.org>
I'm incorporating this into the current editor's version:

On 3/11/10 6:47 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@talis.com> wrote:
> The other case is the base URI for the document received:
> PUT /rdf-graphs/employees?graph=http://otherserver/consultant/56
> Host: example.com
> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
> <rdf:RDF
> .... no base named ....
> </rdf:RDF>
> gets a base URI for the parsing of the RDF/XML document of
> http://otherserver/consultant/56

This seems like too strong an interpretation of "For a document that is
enclosed within another entity, such as a message or archive, the retrieval
context is that entity." I'm assuming that is the layer you used to justify
this? It is the identifier that is embedded not the serialization of the RDF
graph it identifies (indirectly).

-- Chime


P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and

Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 22:35:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC