W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: SD doc review

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:44:13 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3YuQAkrQmQKhOlKjnjKnMalVuNiDfZgIWI9IG@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
[snip]
>> 3.2.5 sd:EntailmentRegime
>> (as described in SPARQL 12.6 @@ old sparql spec reference)
>> could be replaced by adding a reference to the entailment regimes doc:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/
>
> OK. Should I link to directly to http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/ ?

I think that would be appropriate because that is where entailment
regimes are defined. The Query spec just contains some conditions that
entailment regimes have to satisfy.

>> @@ need to include this in the references section. <- Namespaces
>> Should be replced by an entry in the reference section.
>
> Do you mean the link should be removed to the Unique URIs for Entailment Regimes and instead be replaced by just an entry in the references section?

Probably having both is best, i.e., keep the link and additionally add
the bib entry and point to it from the text. My main interest is
reducing the number of @@ open tasks that can easily be fixed.

Cheers,
Birte

-- 
Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 306
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3QD
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283529
Received on Monday, 10 May 2010 15:44:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT