W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

SPARQL WG Agenda Tuesday May 4, 2010

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 19:04:15 -0400
Message-ID: <4BDF566F.3010001@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-05-04

Lee

     *  Date of Call: Tuesday May 04, 2010
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 60 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: Ivan Herman (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-05-04

[edit] Agenda

     * Admin (10min)
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-04-27
           o Next meeting: 2010-05-11 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST (scribe: 
Sandro)
     * Comment handling - see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
     * Liaisons - Is there anything to report of relevance to the SPARQL WG?
           o RIF WG (Sandro)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
           o eGov (Sandro)
     * Summarize recent SPARQL Update changes
           o SPARQL update model 
(http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#t32)
           o USING/USING NAMED/WITH
                 + See 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#t413
                 + This is in response to 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/206, but note that that 
"task force" did not reach consensus and left the matter up to the editors
     * Federated query discussion topics (20min)
           o BINDINGS?
           o BINDINGS and Update? 
(http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/fed/service#update) See ISSUE-37
           o Protocol implications?
           o See post-F2F thread on mailing list, Andy's review, David's 
review
     * Can we resolve ISSUE-54 as per the apparent consensus in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0487.html 
& following messages?
     * Review Documents for Review Readiness and Pick Reviewers

[edit] Regrets

     * Axel
     * Steve
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 23:04:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT