W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: SPARQL Grammar updated

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:45:57 +0100
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <59733EDA-BC8A-4985-BCB3-BD11305E4501@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
On 2010-04-25, at 18:11, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> At F2F3, we converged on this named parameters form of GROUP_CONCAT.  I suggested a uniform treatment with params available in custom aggregates. However, having tried this, I found it leads to complexity without obvious benefit.
> Question:
> Is this legal:
> where ?sep is some in-scope variable?  For now, I've made the separator a fixed string depending clarification.

I think constants only is a good idea. As I mentioned at the F2F, it otherwise raises a host of issues around grouped v's non-grouped values.

As everything after the ; is passed directly to the set function, that expression must either be GROUP BY ?sep, or it would have to be SAMPLE(?sep), or similar, and I don't really want to go there.

- Steve

Steve Harris, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 26 April 2010 09:46:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:00 UTC