W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:30:48 -0400
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group WG" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0DCA2F9A-1054-4D0B-B610-1114FC1FF59C@evilfunhouse.com>
To: "Chimezie Ogbuji" <ogbujic@ccf.org>
On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:

> In 4.1:
> 
> [[[
> We recall from [SPARQL] that IRIs for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify
> a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph (or, more precisely:
> by a document that serializes a graph)
> ]]]
> 
> ==>
> 
> [[[
> We recall from [SPARQL] that IRIs for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify
> a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph.
> ]]]

I thought the parenthetical was the (more) correct interpretation, so: "IRIs for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify a resource, and the resource **has a representation that serializes that graph**". Have I misunderstood (or are we saying the same thing)?

thanks,
.greg
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:37:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT