W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:12:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4BCC72CE.8000605@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
CC: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 4/19/2010 4:46 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 18/04/2010 8:04 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
>>>
>>>> That makes sense to me - what's the range of sd:extensionFunction?
>>>
>>> Right now it's sd:Function which had covered both scalar functions
>>> and aggregates. By making a new sd:extensionAggregate, we could then
>>> have the respective ranges be appropriately specific.
>>
>> Also, once this is done there's no need for both sd:Function and
>> sd:ScalarFunction. Unless someone objects I'll remove
>> sd:ScalarFunction and just use sd:Function.
>
> +1 : good idea.

Yes, this all makes sense to me.

Lee

>
> Andy
>
>>
>> .greg
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 15:12:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT