W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: comment on update

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:29:26 -0400
Message-ID: <4BBA01D6.3060305@thefigtrees.net>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'd probably just wait until Paul and Alex have had a chance to evaluate 
the model in the paper and see if we'll be incorporating anything from 
it or not, before replying.

lee

On 4/2/2010 1:18 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I reworded the proposed answer slightly to possibly reflect that we might consider his input when we get to the update semantics...
> If you want to change that wording please feel free:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1
>
> thanks!
> Axel
>
> On 2 Apr 2010, at 17:42, Paul Gearon wrote:
>
>> Hi Axel,
>>
>> I get the impression that Ross is well aware of what we've been doing.
>> I believe that he is offering his calculus as a contribution to the
>> SPARQL Update effort since we have not had the opportunity to develop
>> one for ourselves.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul Gearon
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Axel Polleres<axel.polleres@deri.org>  wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> just read http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0009.html and added it to the comments...
>>> not sure what to think of it. The mail doesn't really indicate any suggestions.
>>>
>>> I would be inclined to answer something short along the following lines. Agreed?
>>>
>>> ==========================
>>> Dear Ross,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the input. You can check the current working draft of the SPARQL/Update specification
>>> that the group is working on, which is an evolution of the SPARQL/Update proposal you cite in your paper [4], at:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/
>>>
>>> Comments on this document are highly welcome!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Axel, on behalf of the WG
>>> ==========================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 15:30:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:42 GMT