W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: styling summary

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:04:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4B3A1A8F.6060507@thefigtrees.net>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Some of these problems have been resolved by fixing the perms on local.css.

Some remain.

Lee

Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> I haven't debugged anything yet, but here's what I currently see:
> 
> Firefox:
> 
>   * Locally, via file://
>     => the XSLT isn't applied and I just see a jumble of text from the 
> XML doc
> 
>   * From w3.org, via http://
>     => I see a rendered doc, but missing a bunch of styling (colors and 
> table lines in examples, for instance)
> 
> 
> IE8:
> 
>   * Locally, via file://
>     => I see a rendered doc with (AFAICT) all the CSS styling correctly 
> applied
> 
>   * From w3.org, via http://
>     => I get a strange error processing the DTD:
> 
> """
> Cannot view XML input using style sheet. Please correct the error and 
> then click the Refresh button, or try again later.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> 
> The character '>' was expected. Error processing resource 
> 'http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/shared/xmlspec.dtd'. Line 21...
> 
>         |%illus.class;|%ednote.class;%local.obj.mix;"atusp.class;.
> ----------------------------------------------------^
> """
> 
> It's a strange error because as far as I can tell, that line doesn't 
> exist in the DTD.
> 
> 
> Google Chrome:
> 
>   * Locally, via file://
>     => shows up rendered with styles, like in IE8
> 
>   * From w3.org, via http://
>     => It seems to load a rendered doc, but there is JS (as text) at the 
> top, and then I can't scroll the page at all
> 
> 
> 
> So.... without having done any debugging, I'm wondering if there's a 
> parse error somewhere that the browsers are all handling differently. 
> Would be happy with other sets of eyes though!
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 29 December 2009 15:05:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT