W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

ACTION summary

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:25:08 +0000
Message-Id: <9370A308-F902-4BB4-8B15-29BB0A932AAC@deri.org>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Below is a summary of the open actions we currently have. We might not want to go through all actions in the TC 
today to not loose time on the draft discussion, so I just start with those actions which can be probably closed:

CAN BE CLOSED?
==============

ACTION-134: Steve and Andy to figure out what happens with SELECT ( _:b1 AS ?blank)
I'd suggest to close ACTION-134 referring to 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0539.html
probably convert it into an issue?

ACTION-135: Steve to summarize Query security issues in security section once document has been merged
I'd suggest to close ACTION-135 re: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#security
Shall we task Steve to link issue-19 from there?

ACTION-136: Axel to ask Paul to look at security section in Update document
I'd suggest to close ACTION-136 re:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#sec_security
Shall we task Paul to link issue-19 from there?

ACTION-144: Paul to start conversation in an email about uses cases for INSERT / DELETE
can be closed?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0551.html

ACTION-154: Sandro to work with birte to figure out video conference facilities for F2F3.
Can this be closed re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0624.html ?

LEFT OPEN:
==========

I would leave the following actions open for the moment, not having enough information about them, 
if anyone thinks different, let me know:

ACTION-70: open
ACTION-77: open
ACTION-116: open. Does the note on RESTful-ness in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ 
 discharge this action?
ACTION-126: open
ACTION-130: open
ACTION-131: open
ACTION-132: open
ACTION-146: open, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0628.html
Paul, do you suggest to close issue-20? I would still like to draft some examples on that involving empty graphs.
ACTION-150: open
ACTION-152, ACTION-150, ACTION-149, ACTION-148: although some mails have been sent, I suggest that these should 
all be put consistently in a separate subsection "Changelog" under the "Status" section and thus leave them open.
Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 11:25:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT