- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:05:47 +0000
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
As input to item > • Review Document Review Readiness (and maybe already done comments): on the aganda, I tried to summarise the status of the various documents: Summary of document status and reviewers: General: - Layout problems on the server? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0628.html I) Query: ========= http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml looks ok for review. Reviewers: Birte, Matt Souri, Axel - Olivier's comments? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0634.html Negation in FILTERs (EXISTS, NOT EXISTS)? Does it add Expressivity? Some details: 1) "The structure of this document will change to full integrate the new features" -> "The structure of this document will change to fully integrate the new features" 2) - I still suggest to include a rough changelog, marked as such, or was the conclusion we need none, since this is the first integrated document? I'd still suggest to describe the changes re:FPWD on a high level in a few sentences. II) Update: =========== http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml looks ok for review. Reviewers: AndyS, Axel 1) Based on this mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0628.html - Can we clos some issues? - Is this a basis for the changelog? III) Protocol: ============== http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/protocol-1.1/ Will there be a new version in this round? Report back from Lee, David needed. IV) Service Description: ========================= http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/ looks ok for review. Reviewers: David, Alex, Axel - Changelog (I'd suggest to put this under an own subheading): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0614.html - Entailment URIs discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0627.html http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ V) Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs: ============================================== http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ ok for review? reviewers: AndyS, LeeF, Axel - changelog to be included in the document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0609.html - no table of contents. VI) PropertyPaths: ================== looks ok for review. this would be FPWD? Reviewers: Souri, Ivan, Lee, Axel - Ivan's comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0623.html - shall we reference the time allowed features that might go into query in the end from Query? (to make readers aware) VII) Entailment: ================ looks ok for review. Reviewers: Ivan, Axel - Ivan's comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0625.html - Olivier's comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0636.html
Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 10:06:21 UTC