W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Comment on: entailment

From: Olivier Corby <Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:54:46 +0100
Message-ID: <4B2F7E26.6020506@sophia.inria.fr>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Some comments on entailment document: 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/xmlspec.xml

Olivier


Intuiltively
->
Intuitively


varaibles
->
variables


well-formeded
->
well-formed


applyed
->
applied


scoping graph as given in SPARQL 1.
->
in SPARQL 1.0.


RDFS entailed tripes
->
triples


For entailment regimes other then simple entailment this point
->
For entailment regimes other *than* simple entailment, this point


if a query contains the one of the above triple patterns
->
if a query contains *one* of the above triple patterns


inconsistet
->
inconsistent



3 RDFS Entailment Regime

The "Query Answers" text in the table is the same text as the one from 
RDF Entailment Regime.



an RDF XML literal and has to be
interpreted it as some element tha is NOT in rdfs:Literal
->
an RDF XML literal and has to be
interpreted *as* some element *that* is NOT in rdfs:Literal



inconistent
->
inconsistent


Another solution ould be
->
Another solution would be



6 OWL 2 Direct Semantics Entailment Regime


neccessary
->
necessary




8 Entailment Regimes and Data Sets (Informative)


This follows from conditions conditions
->
This follows from conditions
Received on Monday, 21 December 2009 13:55:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT