W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Draft response to LD-2

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:04:39 +0000
Message-ID: <4B279777.8090504@talis.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

    ... sd:namedGraph <http://example/graph> ;


Could the example be changed to:

    ... sd:namedGraph [ sd:named <http://example/graph>  ;
                        sd:graph <#description> ] .

(this accomodates the case where a service hoists a graph with a forgein 
name - the serice needs to describe what it provides, so the description 
is about the graph in the store, not the graph globally.

	Andy


On 15/12/2009 05:55, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>
>> Works for me!
>>
>> Gregory Williams wrote:
>>> I've drafted a response to Leigh Dodds' email comments on the service description FPWD:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ldodds-sd-1
>
> Do I need more than one +1, or can I go ahead and send this?
>
> thanks,
> .greg
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 14:05:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT