W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Inner CONSTRUCT (Was Drafting definitions for select expressions)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:43:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4B1E8226.2050005@talis.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 08/12/2009 16:10, Axel Polleres wrote:
>> but I don't know a use case that requires mining bnodes.  What had you
>> in mind? (noting we can add this later but can't remove it once spec'ed)
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I am ok with that, and the implied action that if that is really needed,
> <chairhatoff>  I</chairhatoff>  (or anybody else who thinks it's worthwhile)
> should come up with more concrete use cases...
>
> The use case<chairhatoff>  I</chairhatoff>  had in mind was the query on
> [top of p.6, 1] which creates some bnode to model co-author relationships.
>
> Let me see what<chairhatoff>  I</chairhatoff>  get back from ACTION-133
> and depending on the outcome<chairhatoff>  I</chairhatoff>  will summarise
> resp. use cases all in one.
>
> Axel
>
> 1. http://www.polleres.net/publications/poll-etal-2007.pdf

There is a related issue about introducing new URIs where the URI string 
i built by string operations.  We had that as part of TF-LIB - e.g. 
IRI(expr), expr is string valued.

	Andy
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 16:43:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT