W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Example updates

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:03:56 +0100
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-id: <200912081103.57096.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
On Thursday 3. December 2009 02:44:27 Paul Gearon wrote:
> Are you suggesting using FROM to indicate what the WHERE clause should
> be resolved against? If so, then sure. However, the advantage of WITH
> is that it also applies to INSERT and DELETE where no graph is
> supplied. In that case, the word "FROM" isn't appropriate. WITH is a
> little more general, even if it's not very pretty.

Contrary to Steve, I cannot say that I think I can say "I see", let me ask 
some silly questions: :-)

The consensus is that FROM will only apply to the WHERE clause, never 
anything else, right?

Then, we have 
INSERT { GRAPH <foo> { pattern 
which is used to specify that the INSERTions go into graph <foo> ? 

So, WITH, is that supposed to make it possible to name both the graph 
matched in the WHERE clause and the graph inserted into, or just the 
latter?

Cheers,

Kjetil
-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kjetil@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 10:04:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT