W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update?

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:24:58 +0000
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EEA66FE7-3D99-4860-AAA5-D88CC0F33354@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:01, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 23/11/2009 17:36, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> I'll let Steve speak, but I meant rethink it for SPARQL *Update* - no
>> one was proposing changing SPARQL Query's model, since we need to  
>> ensure
>> backwards compatibility. Sorry for any confusion.
> I read it as for SPARQL Update and nothing else :-)
> The query model is embedded in global naming via URIs and in AWWW so  
> it's a bit out of scope to make changes :-)

The default graph bit isn't, as that has no URI. But it's still out of  
scope for this WG to change that.

> There is a big difference with update - the server can now be  
> responsible for the current, definitive set of data for the graph,  
> primarily for URIs within it's part of the global namespace but we  
> have to think through the implications for updates to graphs named  
> by other parties.

Yes, that is quite a complex issue. I remember discussing something  
around this area with Dave - regarding SPARQL stores as a cache. I  
don't think that was discussed in the F2F meetings though, so I not  
don't think that is what Lee was referring to.

- Steve

Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 18:25:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:57 UTC