W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update?

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:20:57 +0000
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0E84557C-BCCF-4C41-A21C-50C99F739098@garlik.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
On 23 Nov 2009, at 17:36, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>>> SteveH and Dave Beckett expressed a contrary opinion at the F2F  
>>> that it
>>> might be better to rethink the whole graph management approach for
>>> SPARQL Query, but I feel strongly that that would be very  
>>> confusing for
>>> users and implementors alike.
>> I'd like to hear more about that - is there a description of an  
>> alternative?
>
> I'll let Steve speak, but I meant rethink it for SPARQL *Update* -  
> no one was proposing changing SPARQL Query's model, since we need to  
> ensure backwards compatibility. Sorry for any confusion.

Um. It certainly sounds like the sort of thing I might have said, but  
I have no recollection of it whatsoever. Sorry.

Can I blame jetlag?

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
9AD
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 18:21:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT