W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:01:46 +0000
Message-ID: <4B0ACE0A.2050308@talis.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 23/11/2009 17:36, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> I'll let Steve speak, but I meant rethink it for SPARQL *Update* - no
> one was proposing changing SPARQL Query's model, since we need to ensure
> backwards compatibility. Sorry for any confusion.

I read it as for SPARQL Update and nothing else :-)

The query model is embedded in global naming via URIs and in AWWW so 
it's a bit out of scope to make changes :-)

There is a big difference with update - the server can now be 
responsible for the current, definitive set of data for the graph, 
primarily for URIs within it's part of the global namespace but we have 
to think through the implications for updates to graphs named by other 
parties.

	Andy

>
> Lee
>
Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 18:02:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT