- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:06:15 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 10/11/2009 17:42, Ivan Herman wrote: > Hi Andy, > > I think I understand. However... one thing I learned was to keep the > answers the shortest possible...:-) Is it o.k. if I do not put that in? > > Ivan Yes - that's fine. I raised more as an interest point rather a needed to be said. Andy > > Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> >> On 10/11/2009 12:15, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>> >>> Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> This was an interesting comment - might be worth adding that we aren't >>>> planning on do premises for queries either which is nearby to the >>>> comment, I thought. >>> >>> I am not sure I understand what you say:-) >>> >>> I. >> >> The ability to assert into the data for the lifetime and scope of the >> query only. >> >> Putting a grounded triple in the pattern and having entailment effects >> on the query seemed to be very like asserting the triple (2) for the >> purposed of the query and then querying. >> >> Andy >
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:06:40 UTC