- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:08:14 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > I do think a member submission is technically doable, as long as the > SPARQL WG declares the work to be out of scope. My org wouldn't support doing this as a member submission, FWIW. It's just not that scale of thing, IMO. > But the normal approach, I think, would be for someone to prepare it and > show it the WG, and if the WG says "sorry, we don't have time to > actually work on this right now" (or they just don't want to), then they > publish it as a WG note. For example, as I recall this is what happened > with LBase [1] in RDF Core and OWL 1 XML [2] in WebOnt. And with SPARQL Results in JSON. It would be ideal, though, if we could avoid prejudging this as DOA, at least before it actually arrives. :> Cheers, Kendall
Received on Friday, 30 October 2009 17:09:07 UTC