W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Update review

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:10:19 +0100
Cc: Luke Wilson-Mawer <luke.wilson-mawer@garlik.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <15D6780A-270B-452F-B081-E474E73DA455@deri.org>
To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
Hi,

On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:14, Simon Schenk wrote:

> Am Freitag, den 16.10.2009, 15:32 +0100 schrieb Luke Wilson-Mawer:
>> * Some of the 'Notes' in this section seem to be more like issues,
>> but don't reference issue numbers. E.g. 'Is DELETE too verbose?',
>> 'Is MODIFY syntax required?'
>
> Created ISSUES as follows and replaced the corresponding notes:
>
> ISSUE-45
> Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside SELECT
> queries?
>
> ISSUE-46
> Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside update
> language queries?
>
> ISSUE-47
> Is MODIFY syntax required?
>
> ISSUE-48
> Is DELETE too verbose?

There was also discussions regarding a MOVE keyword, based on the  
previous SPARUL review by Luke and myself

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0073.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0069.html

Best,

Alex.

>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
>
> -- 
> Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz
> http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de
> http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~sschenk
> Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/
>

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 11:10:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT