Re: Update review

Hi,

On 20 Oct 2009, at 09:14, Simon Schenk wrote:

> Am Freitag, den 16.10.2009, 15:32 +0100 schrieb Luke Wilson-Mawer:
>> * Some of the 'Notes' in this section seem to be more like issues,
>> but don't reference issue numbers. E.g. 'Is DELETE too verbose?',
>> 'Is MODIFY syntax required?'
>
> Created ISSUES as follows and replaced the corresponding notes:
>
> ISSUE-45
> Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside SELECT
> queries?
>
> ISSUE-46
> Can INSERTS, DELETES, and other 'subupdates' be nested inside update
> language queries?
>
> ISSUE-47
> Is MODIFY syntax required?
>
> ISSUE-48
> Is DELETE too verbose?

There was also discussions regarding a MOVE keyword, based on the  
previous SPARUL review by Luke and myself

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0073.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009JulSep/0069.html

Best,

Alex.

>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
>
> -- 
> Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz
> http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de
> http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~sschenk
> Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/
>

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .