W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2009

Comments on Service Description

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:06:10 +0000
To: SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3693ECF6DBE@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Overall, looks good.
Plain text - there should be more use of it!

Sec 2:

Minor: "SPARQL services made available via the SPARQL Protocol should return"

s/should/SHOULD/

Sec 3.1:

Minor: It's IRI.

Sec 3.2:

Minor: Graphs, not datasets, have entailment regimes although the cases of one graph at a service endpoint or all graphs at the service endpoint having the same entailment regime makes sense.

Mixed cases occur - the same data via two named graphs is something I see being done.


An example, including extracts from VoiD would be good.  Time may not allow.

	Andy


Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 12:06:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:40 GMT