W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: service description vocabulary

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:31:08 +0100
Message-Id: <BF7175F4-2D4F-49E3-B5E2-54D8C873EC55@garlik.com>
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 25 Sep 2009, at 05:08, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> I don't think we need to differentiate - I tend to think a single  
>> mechanism for supported features combined with URIs for standard  
>> features is sufficient, and will give the community sufficient room  
>> to define URIs and extra parameters for extension features... But I  
>> haven't thought it through too well.
>
> OK. That's my inclination as well, but thought it was worthwhile to  
> at least bring it up.

For what it's worth, the LV2 audio plugin specification (http://lv2plug.in/spec/ 
) does this to indicate the use of extensions, and it works well.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
9AD
Received on Saturday, 26 September 2009 09:31:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:08:28 GMT