Re: service description vocabulary

On 25 Sep 2009, at 05:08, Gregory Williams wrote:
>> I don't think we need to differentiate - I tend to think a single  
>> mechanism for supported features combined with URIs for standard  
>> features is sufficient, and will give the community sufficient room  
>> to define URIs and extra parameters for extension features... But I  
>> haven't thought it through too well.
>
> OK. That's my inclination as well, but thought it was worthwhile to  
> at least bring it up.

For what it's worth, the LV2 audio plugin specification (http://lv2plug.in/spec/ 
) does this to indicate the use of extensions, and it works well.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
9AD