W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: Separate grammar document for spec

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:29:36 +0000
To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3693DEB2544@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Keeping in sync is important.

http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/sparql-1.1.html


has two entry point: QueryUnit and UpdateUnit  because the majority of the grammar rules go into pattern matching, most of it is shared material.

If we separate out the various components and process separately, then we need to manage numbering and links across fragments.

	Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Simon Schenk
> Sent: 15 September 2009 16:14
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Separate grammar document for spec
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Paul and I are thinking about whether it would be a good idea to extract
> the fragment of the grammar common to Query and Update to a separate xml
> file and include it into both documents. That should prevent them from
> getting out of sync.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Cheers,
> Simon
> 
> --
> Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz
> http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de

> http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~sschenk

> Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/

Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 16:31:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:08:28 GMT