W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

RE: Minutes of 2009-08-18

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:29:03 +0000
To: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3693CEC287D@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Simon Schenk
> Sent: 1 September 2009 15:12
> To: Steve Harris
> Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group
> Subject: Re: Minutes of 2009-08-18
> 
> Am Dienstag, den 01.09.2009, 15:03 +0100 schrieb Steve Harris:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've just read the minutes at
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-08-18

> >   and there seems to be a belief that it's common practice to return
> > an HTML form when a SPARQL endpoint URI is requested without the
> > SPARQL-mandated parameters.
> >
> > I'd like to test that assumption - how many systems are known to do
> > this?
> 
> Sesame does not.

> 
> Cheers,
> Simon
> 
> > Ours do not, for what it's worth. We generate forms, but on another URI.
> >
> > - Steve
> >

Joseki does not - the form is on another URL normally.

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 14:30:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:08:26 GMT