W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

test cases (was: Re: Variable scope for subqueries)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:22:56 -0400
Message-ID: <4A9BEAD0.1000707@thefigtrees.net>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> How are we capturing the details of agreements?  In the issue tracker
> but at some point they need to be backed up by test cases.   Are we
> doing that as we go along or as a later phase?

Good question. In general, I'm pretty happy with carefully worded WG
resolutions, but I agree that test-case-backed resolutions are preferable.

I'm not sure how best to proceed on test cases - I suppose it makes
sense to leverage the framework of the DAWG, but I'd really love to have
a volunteer or volunteers to act as test case editor / curator.


> I suggest now because it gets some work happening in parallel and
> it's a more concrete record than WG wording of resolutions.  You also
> get to find out when some other issue affects a decision as well.

> Andy
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 15:23:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC