W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: "suboptions" of Option 7

From: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:11:40 +0100
Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8A6003BB-D7E9-4CFD-ADD6-E6FC44A81EE8@deri.org>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
HI,

On 19 Aug 2009, at 19:06, Gregory Williams wrote:

> On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Alexandre Passant wrote:
>
>> While I'm really willing to see RDFa annotated endpoints, I think  
>> that 2 issues in that case would be:
>> - Some endpoints do not provide any forms for query input (unless  
>> we want to say in the next spec that any endpoint must have a form  
>> for query input - I'd favor that as well)
>
> I'm not sure having a service description in HTML and/or RDFa  
> implies that the HTML *has* to have a query form.

I should have said - some endpoint do not provide any HTML page and  
just raise an error if no query is sent.
That's something we have to consider regarding that proposal.

Alex.

> It might be nice, but the spec might not have to force the query  
> form on everybody (and in fact not doing so might help us re: abuse  
> of conneg, allowing the people who are going to add a query form to  
> be the ones who are abusing conneg, not the spec).
>
> .greg
>

--
Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 11:35:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT